"SORRY, WE DON'T TREAT AMERICAN CITIZENS" Page 5

After we learned from world's top ADR surgeons (emails) that I was not a candidate for the artificial disc surgery and the ProDisc that I received on Oct 2006, we have been begging ProSpine (my operating surgeon) for help (emails). They denied any problem (emails).
Short story, some research, studies, media data are here: PRODISC_Dr.Bertagnoli

I was told by other Prodisc surgeons that I needed a revision (emails) but the problems was: it was nearly impossible to find anyone who could do a revision of ProDisc. The removal of ProDisc device is considered to be life threatening in every case according to many expert opinion studies (see references in the link above)

After nearly hundred of emails to doctors, when my husband finally found two surgeons in Germany who had an experience in Prodisc revision, I was refused a medical treatment based on my USA citizenship...not even a treatment but a simple consultation.
The basis of denial was:"Sorry, we do not treat American citizens" (emails from those clinics are available as prove).


We thought it was a
mistake. We explained that we were not on medical tourism but that:
  • we resided in Germany
  • we worked in Germany
  • we paid German taxes and pension contributions into the system
  • we had German health insurance...
  • We proposed to pay cash upfront and sign any papers.
We were told, yet again, that they do not treat American Citizens.
  1. 16.04.2007  Nils Brueggemann, Denial of treatment
  2. 12.04.2007 Silvia Herfs, We can not treat patients from the USA
  3. 06.08.2007 Dr. Stephan Noe, “i'm not able to operate us-americans, because of my "operating- insurance". (emails available as proof)
We have researched and found that discrimination is illegal by the E.U. treaties:
" All discrimination on the basis of nationality is banned by the European Union (EU) Treaties"

EU Discrimination Rights


My husband contacted EU (emails/pdf's available as well) to inform the E.U. Commission on Human Rights that U.S.Citizens legally residing and working in Germany, and who pay German taxes, and who subscribe to the Public Health Insurance System, are not afforded the same legal rights as EC Member State residents, and may be legally discriminated against  (i.e, denied critical medical attention even if proposed cash payment upfront for visit/treatment) solely based on their U.S.Citizenship.

This
interpretation is according to Mr. Peter Bosch, {Head of Unit, Directorate-General Justice, Freedom andSecurity} who has kindly executed a thorough review of the regulations and directives, as noted in his letter to us (part of the letter presented below):
 
"If your wife has not yet acquired EC long-term resident status (5 years) and her situation is confined to one Member State, then there is unfortunately no Community rule applicable to your situation and it remains to be fully governed by German law.  Acknowledging this 'rights gap' situation, in October last year the European Commission tabled a proposal: 
Proposal for a Council Directive on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State) which aims to ensure equal treatment with nationals for third-country workers who are legally residing and working in a Member State, also as regards health care apply also to those persons coming to a Member State directly from a third country.
  However, as this is still a proposal under discussion in the European institutions, its provisions are not yet applicable."
(Year 2011: the provisions are still not applicable).

So, in other words, there is a loop hole and non EU citizens, i.e.Americans,  fall through it.
Americans who go abroad on job assignments with their American companies or on business traveler ARE NOT AWARE that they might
not be afforded the same legal rights as EC Member State residents, and may be legally discriminated against (i.e, denied critical medical attention like in my case).

But ... their companies may not be eager to tell them about it.
Such common knowledge by employees might hurt the international business of their employer. So, it seems, some companies, even if they do know that such a
discriminatory practices might happen with their employees abroad, might withhold such critical safety information from people who are about to transfer abroad with their families and children. They might just turn a blind eye to it or they might want even to cover up.

Such companies, might even be voted the most ethical companies to work for year after year ....
                                                             


 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.